Neoliberalism- performativity culture

PowerPoint wont be presented, so slides need to be detailed
Topic: Neoliberalism-The impact of Performativity Culture on education  (in-depth analysis, criticality  evaluation must be included in all slides with, clear consistent, sign posting throughout.)
– Harvard referencing, include in text citation
– Slides need to be detailed and flow from one slide to the next *

Word Count:  detailed slides aside form introduction and conclusion slides
Introduction: This PowerPoint will discuss……
1. Define performativity culture with references, What discourse does it relate to , how and why (neoliberalism)
2. How is performativity measured? League tables etc…. More detail and depth..
3. Impact of performativity on children  (relate back to performativity culture)
4. Impact of performativity on teachers and institutions (relate back to performativity culture)
5. Children as commodities what does it mean and – how does it relate back to performativity?
6. Alternatives to neoliberal discourse ( Local pedagogical responses), how this can be implemented and achieved in education
7. Summary and conclusion of PowerPoint
*Relate to self-determination theory on impact of performativity
*Relate to focaults panoptican of surveillance and how this relates to performativity culture
*Relate to Bourdieu where appropriate on  cultural capital and symbolic violence, relate back to performativity culture

References to be used and any peer reviewed academic article deemed appropriate.

Ball. S.J (2016) Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast. Sage Journals.

Ball, S. J. (2003) ‘The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity’, Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), doi: 10.1080/0268093022000043065. P

Blundell, D. (2012) Education and Constructions of Childhood. London: Continuum.

Boxley, S. (2003) ‘Performativity and Capital in Schools’, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1(1).

Brown, P. (2013) ‘Education, Opportunity, and the Prospects for Social Mobility’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(5–6), pp.678–700.

Francis, B. and Mills, M. (2012) ‘What Would a Socially Just Education System Look Like?’, Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), pp.577-585. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2012.710014.

James, A. and Prout, A. (eds) (1990), Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood , (1st edn) London: Routledge.

Keddie, A. (2016) ‘Children of the Market: Performativity, Neoliberal Responsibilisation and the Construction of Student Identities’, Oxford Review of Education, 42(1),

Keddie, A. (2017) ‘Primary School Leadership in England: Performativity and Matters of Professionalism’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(8), pp.1245-1257.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018) Equity in Education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/publications/equity-in-education-9789264073234-en.html

Pollard, A. and Pollard, A. (2014) Reflective teaching in schools. 4th ed. Bloomsbury Academic.

Reay, D. (2012) ‘What would a socially just education system look like? Centre for Labour and Social Studies Think Piece’. Available at: http://classonline.org.uk/docs/2012_Diane_Reay_- _a_socially_just_education_system.pdf (Accessed 01 April 2022). •

Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000) ‘The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self Determination of Behaviour’, Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp.227-268.

Sims, M. (2017) ‘Neoliberalism and Early Childhood’, Cogent Education, 4(1),

Sullivan, A., (2007) ‘Cultural Capital, Cultural Knowledge and Ability’, Sociological Research Online, 12(6),  Available at: https://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/6/1.html

Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2010) The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Book

*Pierre Bourdieu- Key Concepts by Michael James Grenfell
*Foucault and Neoliberalism by Daniel Zamora, Michael C. Behrent