Adverse Event or Near-Miss Analysis

This is editing from the paper you completed. It came back and there were a lot of inconsistencies with APA formatting, grammar and also concept. Please revise.

PROFESSORS COMMENTS THESE ARE THE SECTIONS WHERE I GOT BASIC. IT SHOULD BE DISTINGUED. PLEASE READ THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISTINGUHED AND THE PROFESSORS COMMENTS. THANK YOU

CRITERION

Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Evaluates quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Identifies criteria by which to evaluate the technologies.

Proficient

Evaluates quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

Basic

Lists quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk or increase patient safety, but does not evaluate how those technologies were used or could have been used more effectively.

Non-Performance

Does not list quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

Faculty Comments:

I can tell you attempted to address technologies and provided a great discussion on dashboards. Can you list specific technologies required to reduce / prevent similar events? Include give details to how those technologies were used, or how they could be more usefully employed? Please take a look at the “distinguished” requirements for this section so you will see what needs to be added. Please see additional comments in your assessment.

CRITERION

Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Incorporates relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement. Evaluates the quality of the data.

Proficient

Incorporates relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.

Basic

Attempts to identify metrics relevant to the adverse event or near-miss incident, but omits relevant data or does not show how metrics relate to the event or incident.

Non-Performance

Does not identify relevant metrics of the adverse event or near-miss incident to support need for improvement.

Faculty Comments:

I can see you attempted to identify some metrics relevant to the adverse event or near miss incident. Can you provide relevant data to meaningfully show how metrics relate to the event or incident? Please take a look at the “distinguished” requirements for this section so you will see what needs to be added. Please see additional comments in your assessment.

COMPETENCY 3

Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

CRITERION

Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Communicates analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective, and error-free manner, writing clearly and logically.

Proficient

Communicates analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner, writing content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Basic

Attempts to communicate analysis and proposed initiative professionally and effectively but there are lapses, omissions, and/or errors that detract from the overall message.

Non-Performance

Does not communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional, effective manner; does not write clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Faculty Comments:

I could follow your main theme; however, there were many typos and grammatical errors. I recommend careful proof-reading before submitting for a grade. Please consider using available resources. Here’s a link to the Capella Writing Center to learn more about scholarly writing: https://campus.capella.edu/web/writing-center/home

CRITERION

Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, formatting citations and references, using APA style without errors.

Proficient

Integrates relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Basic

Sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated; citations or references are missing or not formatted according to APA style.

Non-Performance

Does not integrate relevant sources to support arguments; does not correctly format citations and references using APA style.

Faculty Comments:

There were many APA inconsistencies in both your paper and in your reference list. I hope you will reach out to your tutor, who has wonderful resources to help you with APA. The supplemental resources link on the course room homepage is also a helpful resource. In addition, here’s a link to APA formatting that may be helpful: http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx