Management

Paper details:

Mastery Case: Consulting to Bella’ Day Spa and Hair Salon Read the case study: Bella’s Day Spa and Hair Salon.pdf 1. Conduct an evidence-based analysis of the factors that may be influencing the desirable outcomes at the spa. 2. Develop a mapping of the situation at Bella’s. Draft a decision table that lists the factors that will need to be examined. In the first column, list the desired outcomes where interventions are needed to gain control over the situation. Cite the paper (2nd column) providing the effect size (3rd column) of when a population (4th column) of people has experienced a substantive effect of each intervention factor on one or more of the desired outcomes. Explain how reliable the comparison measures are by listing the Cronbach alpha for each scale (5th column) measuring each substantive causal factor. (0.2 point for each column; 1-point total) 3. Create a sorted list of comparisons for each employee group by completing the first four and the seventh (causal factor) columns of the Sample Mean Weighted Path Calculator. 4. Calculate the group means for each comparison measure from the survey data that was provided by Bella’s Spa (Survey Means). Enter that calculation in the Mean (survey) column in the Sample Mean Weighed Path Calculator. Enter a mean for that same scale from an evidence study in the Mean (EBA) column. Enter the Total Effect of the intervention factor (after applying Wright’s path tracing rule calculations for indirect effects if needed). (2 points) 5. Compare the means for each group comparison measure with the mean and standard deviation reported in the EBA Means column. Which Spa Means were below or above the norm (> 1 standard deviation) established by the EBA means? (2 points) 6. Examine the Sample Mean Weighted Path analysis results to develop a written recommendation for what Bella’s Spa should do to improagnve their outcomes. (3 points)