pathophysiology

Paper details:

Scoring Procedure: 1. Refer to the evaluation criteria for definitions of criteria listed below. 2. Check the appropriate rating for each criterion. Criterion scores for graduating master’s students should be predominantly 4 and 5. A consistently fair (3) performance will not yield a passing score. • 5 or 10 = excellent • 4 or 8 = good • 3 or 6 = fair • 2 or 4 = poor • 1 or 2 = very poor AREA I: Introduction and Statement of Purpose Clearly states topic and reason for selection “The Problem….” 1 2 3 4 5 SCORE Population of interest is well defined 1 2 3 4 5 Identify the purpose of the paper (thesis statement/research question/hypothesis) 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (15 possible) AREA II: Background and Literature Review Clarity of problem 2 4 6 8 10 Significance of problem 1 2 3 4 5 Clarity of setting and target population 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of evidence presented 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of research critique, synthesis and analysis 1 2 3 4 5 Analysis of evidence 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (35 possible) AREA III: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Clearly states theory that supports success of the intervention 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of theoretical discussion; how it applies to your target pop and IV 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (10 Possible) AREA IV: INTERVENTION AND IMPLEMENTATION Clarity of strategy proposed, goals and expected outcomes. Clearly state what the IV is. 2 4 6 8 10 Defensibility 1 2 3 4 5 Realism/Feasibility 1 2 3 4 5 Clarity of implementation 1 2 3 4 5 Clarity of roles and interrelationships 1 2 3 4 5 Appropriateness of strategy and implementation 1 2 3 4 5 Clearly stated description of setting and sample 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate awareness of potential needed financial resources needed. 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (45 Possible) AREA V: EVALUATION Clarity of evaluation criteria 1 2 3 4 5 Appropriateness of evaluation procedure 1 2 3 4 5 Goals and expected outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 Identifies metrics for success 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (20 Possible) AREA VI: RISK/BENEFIT Demonstrates ethical considerations 1 2 3 4 5 Weighs out the potential positive and negative implications 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (10 Possible) AREA VII: HEALTH POLICY IMPLICATIONS Clear discussion of cost 1 2 3 4 5 Clear discussion of access 1 2 3 4 5 Clear discussion of quality 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (15 Possible) AREA VIII: CONCLUSION Provides a concise summary of the key components of the paper and project implications 1 2 3 4 5 SECTION POINT TOTAL (5 Possible) AREA IX: TECHNICAL CRITERIA Grammar & Spelling 1 2 3 4 5 Organization of Paper 1 2 3 4 5 APA format 2 4 6 8 10 SECTION POINT TOTagnAL (20 Possible) TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE POINTS 175