qualitative research methodology

In this final Module: Week, you will synthesize the qualitative research methodology of Case
Study research (and applications) (Yin, 2018) as well as the practical use of Lean Six Sigma
(Hall & Scott, 2016; George et al., 2005) to develop a business-facing DMAIC-based case study.
Also, the seven article readings and your own supporting research has provided a variety of
example designs to include single-case holistic to multiple-case embedded case studies.
INSTRUCTIONS
After reviewing the Learn material for this Module: Week and review of the rest of the course, in
current APA format, design a comprehensive (non-Kaizen) DMAIC Case Study integrated with
Lean Six Sigma tools and biblical worldviews. This must include a plan overview section, as
well as design, measure, analyze, improve, control phases.
Create a real-world case (that is, make sure the story is believable, i.e. it consists of sequence of
time and events, problems and issues to solve, identities [positions/titles] and so on.) Sanitize all
names and use only fictitious data. Use at least 3 Lean Six Sigma tools (George et al. (2005) by
chapter [e.g. a value stream mapping and process flow tool, a data collection tool, an identifying
and verifying causes tool, etc.]) and show your work (i.e. if using a value stream map,
measurement selection matrix, scatter plot, etc.; design a graph, chart, or figure as appropriate,
insert, and refer to such as per APA.) If there could be any doubt, the emphasis of this project is
the DMAIC Case Study process. (HINT: The Cabrita et al. (2016) article serves as an excellent
example.) (I WILL PROVIDE THIS ARTICLE to your writer including the textbooks
references).
Required Format
This 2400 minimum, 3000 maximum word paper needs to be written with these main sections:
Cover page
Abstract
Introduction
Case Study ‘Plan’
Define Phase
Measure Phase
Analyze Phase
Improve Phase
Control Phase
Conclusion
References (Use only PEER-REVIEWED (scholarly) articles/journals).